Theoretical Foundations
The intellectual framework of Archaeobytology.
Position papers and manifestos establishing the discipline's core commitments, methodological positioning, and contributions to digital studies.
The intellectual framework of Archaeobytology.
Position papers and manifestos establishing the discipline's core commitments, methodological positioning, and contributions to digital studies.
Archaeobytology as the necessary bridge between Media Studies and Computer Science, rejecting the separation of technical function and cultural meaning.
Coming SoonWhy preservation (The Archive) and creation (The Anvil) must be a unified practice. To build better systems, we must excavate the old; to understand the old, we must build.
Coming SoonWhy platforms are infrastructure, not just software. Moving beyond the "cloud" metaphor to understand the material reality of servers, cables, and code.
Coming SoonA critique of "app for everything" culture. Why we need critique without blueprints, and why not every problem is a software engineering ticket.
Coming SoonOur work is grounded in specific commitments that distinguish Archaeobytology from general tech criticism or computer history.
Evidence-based platform critique. We look at the API responses, the terms of service diffs, and the database schemas.
Why Digital Archaeology matters. Connecting current platform decay to historical cycles of enclosement.
Declaration, Connection, Ground. The fundamental framework for analyzing sovereignty.
Sovereignty as a structural property of the system, not an aspiration of the user.
Coming Soon